Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative Processes (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative Processes (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2008-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1007/s10699-007-9117-4 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Claudia Arrighi; Roberta Ferrario (2008)
    Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative Processes
    in Foundations of science (Print); Springer, Dordrecht (Paesi Bassi)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Claudia Arrighi; Roberta Ferrario (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 75 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 87 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni
  • Num. 1 - Special Issue on Tracking Irrational Sets: Science, Technology, Ethics. Springer, The Netherlands. (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 13 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 12 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 1 (literal)
Note
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
  • Google Scholar (literal)
  • Scopu (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Stanford University, ISTC - Sede di Trento (literal)
Titolo
  • Abductive Reasoning, Interpretation and Collaborative Processes (literal)
Abstract
  • In this paper we want to examine how the mutual understanding of speakers is reached during a conversation through collaborative processes, and what role is played by abductive inference (in the Peircean sense) in these processes. We do this by bringing together contributions coming from a variety of disciplines, such as logic, philosophy of language and psychology. When speakers are engaged in a conversation, they refer to a supposed com- mon ground: every participant ascribes to the others some knowledge, belief, opinion etc. on which to rely in order to reach mutual understanding. As the conversation unfolds, this common ground is continually corrected and reshaped by the interchanges. An abductive reasoning takes place, in a collaborative setting, in order to build new possible theories about the common ground. In reconstructing this process through the use of a working example, we argue that the integration of a collaborative perspective within the Peircean theory of abduction can help to solve some of the drawbacks that the critics of the latter have outlined, for example its permissivity and non generativity. (literal)
Editore
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Autore CNR di
Prodotto
Editore di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it