Comparison between lean-burn and stoichiometric technologies for CNG heavy-duty engines (Articolo in rivista)

Type

• Articolo in rivista (Classe)
• Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)

Label

• Comparison between lean-burn and stoichiometric technologies for CNG heavy-duty engines (Articolo in rivista) (literal)

Anno

• 1995-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi

• 10.4271/950057 (literal)

Alternative label

• Corbo P., Gambino M., Iannaccone S., Unich A. (1995)
  Comparison between lean-burn and stoichiometric technologies for CNG heavy-duty engines
  in SAE transactions; Society of Automotive Engineers, New York (Stati Uniti d'America)
  (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

• Corbo P., Gambino M., Iannaccone S., Unich A. (literal)

Pagina inizio

• 20 (literal)

Pagina fine

• 22 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url

• http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-24644447297&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Comparison+between+lean-burn+and+stoichiometric+technologies+for+CNG+heavy-duty+engines&sid=A1F0EBB09D29069ACB80F49FE0913239.WlW7NKKC52nnQNxjqAQrlA%3a540&sot=q&sdt=b&sl=107&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH%28Comparison+between+lean-burn+and+stoichiometric+technologies+for+CNG+heavy-duty+engines%29&relpos=0&relpos=0&citeCnt=4&searchTerm=TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH%28Comparison+between+lean-burn+and+stoichiometric+technologies+for+CNG+heavy-duty+engines%29 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

• 104 (literal)

Rivista

• SAE transactions (Rivista)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#note

• SAE Paper 950057 (ISSN 0148-7191). (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo

• 4 (literal)

Note

• Scopus (literal)
• Google Scholar (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

• Istituto Motori, CNR, Napoli. (literal)

Titolo

• Comparison between lean-burn and stoichiometric technologies for CNG heavy-duty engines (literal)

Abstract

• Natural gas is a viable alternative fuel to obtain low exhaust emissions. A heavy duty DI diesel engine was converted to Otto cycle natural gas operation. Two alternative solutions were compared: lean burn technology and stoichiometric feed with three-way catalyst and EGR. Power and efficiency were similar for the two above solutions, and exhaust temperature resulted similar to the diesel engine in both cases due to the diluted operation. The lean burn engine met EURO II ECE-R49 limits except for total hydrocarbons. Stoichiometric engine emissions resulted much lower than the limits. Particulate emissions were quite negligible for the two solutions. (literal)

Editore

• Society of Automotive Engineers (Editore)

Prodotto di

• Istituto motori (IM) (Istituto)

Autore CNR

• SABATO IANNACCONE (Unità di personale interno)
• MICHELE GAMBINO (Persona)
• PASQUALE CORBO (Unità di personale interno)

Incoming links:

Prodotto

• Istituto motori (IM) (Istituto)

Autore CNR di

• SABATO IANNACCONE (Unità di personale interno)
• PASQUALE CORBO (Unità di personale interno)
• MICHELE GAMBINO (Persona)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi

• SAE transactions (Rivista)

Editore di

• Society of Automotive Engineers (Editore)