TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2004-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.020 (literal)
Alternative label
  • RICCO G., TOMEI M.C., RAMADORI R., LAERA G. (2004)
    TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX
    in Water research (Oxf.); Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford (Regno Unito)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • RICCO G., TOMEI M.C., RAMADORI R., LAERA G. (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 2103 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 2110 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135404000430 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 38 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 8 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 8 (literal)
Note
  • Scopus (literal)
  • Science direct - Elsevier (literal)
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • CNR - Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, Viale F. De Blasio 5, Bari 70123, Italy CNR - Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, Via Reno, 1, Roma 00198, Italy (literal)
Titolo
  • TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (literal)
Abstract
  • The toxicity of four xenobiotic compounds 3,5-dichlorophenol, formaldehyde, 4-nitrophenol and dichloromethane, representative of industrial wastewater contaminants was evaluated by a simple respirometric procedure set up on the basis of OECD Method 209 and by the Microtox® bioassay. Very good reproducibility was observed for both methods, the variation coefficients being in the range of 2-10% for the respirometric procedure and 6-15% for Microtox®, values that can be considered very good for a biological method. Comparison of EC50 data obtained with the two methods shows that in both cases 3,5-dichlorophenol is more toxic than other compounds investigated and dichloromethane has a very low toxicity value. Intermediate EC50 values were found for the two other chemicals, formaldehyde and 4-nitrophenol. Moreover, the Microtox® EC 50 values are generally lower (except for dichloromethane) than the respirometric ones: these differences could be explained by the fact that the Microtox® method uses a pure culture of marine species and, therefore, should not necessarily be expected to behave like a community of activated sludge bacteria. In conclusion, both methods can be usefully applied for toxicity detection in wastewater treatment plants but it is advisable to take into account that Microtox® is more sensitive than respirometry in estimating the acute toxicity effect on the biomass operating in the plant. (literal)
Editore
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Editore di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it