http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID42230
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (Articolo in rivista)
- Type
- Label
- TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
- Anno
- 2004-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
- 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.020 (literal)
- Alternative label
RICCO G., TOMEI M.C., RAMADORI R., LAERA G. (2004)
TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX
in Water research (Oxf.); Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford (Regno Unito)
(literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
- RICCO G., TOMEI M.C., RAMADORI R., LAERA G. (literal)
- Pagina inizio
- Pagina fine
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135404000430 (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
- Rivista
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
- Note
- Scopus (literal)
- Science direct - Elsevier (literal)
- ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
- CNR - Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, Viale F. De Blasio 5, Bari 70123, Italy
CNR - Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, Via Reno, 1, Roma 00198, Italy (literal)
- Titolo
- TOXICITY ASSESSMENT OF COMMON XENOBIOTIC COMPOUNDS ON MUNICIPAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE: COMPARISON BETWEEN RESPIROMETRY AND MICROTOX (literal)
- Abstract
- The toxicity of four xenobiotic compounds 3,5-dichlorophenol, formaldehyde, 4-nitrophenol and dichloromethane, representative of industrial wastewater contaminants was evaluated by a simple respirometric procedure set up on the basis of OECD Method 209 and by the Microtox® bioassay. Very good reproducibility was observed for both methods, the variation coefficients being in the range of 2-10% for the respirometric procedure and 6-15% for Microtox®, values that can be considered very good for a biological method. Comparison of EC50 data obtained with the two methods shows that in both cases 3,5-dichlorophenol is more toxic than other compounds investigated and dichloromethane has a very low toxicity value. Intermediate EC50 values were found for the two other chemicals, formaldehyde and 4-nitrophenol. Moreover, the Microtox® EC 50 values are generally lower (except for dichloromethane) than the respirometric ones: these differences could be explained by the fact that the Microtox® method uses a pure culture of marine species and, therefore, should not necessarily be expected to behave like a community of activated sludge bacteria. In conclusion, both methods can be usefully applied for toxicity detection in wastewater treatment plants but it is advisable to take into account that Microtox® is more sensitive than respirometry in estimating the acute toxicity effect on the biomass operating in the plant. (literal)
- Editore
- Prodotto di
- Autore CNR
- Insieme di parole chiave
Incoming links:
- Prodotto
- Autore CNR di
- Editore di
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
- Insieme di parole chiave di