http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID41873
Peer review for the evaluation of the academic research: lessons from the Italian experience (Articolo in rivista)
- Type
- Label
- Peer review for the evaluation of the academic research: lessons from the Italian experience (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
- Anno
- 2007-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
- 10.3152/095820207X227501 (literal)
- Alternative label
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
- Reale E., Barbara A., Costantini A. (literal)
- Pagina inizio
- Pagina fine
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
- Rivista
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
- Note
- ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
- Scopu (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
- CERIS CNR
Università di Chieti, It
Università di Chieti, It (literal)
- Titolo
- Peer review for the evaluation of the academic research: lessons from the Italian experience (literal)
- Abstract
- The aim of the paper is to control the reliability of peer review when evaluating academic research in the Three-Year Research Assessment Exercise developed in Italy. Our analysis covers four disciplinary sectors: chemistry, biology, humanities and economics. The results provide evidence that highlights strengths and weaknesses of peer review for judging the quality of the academic research in different fields of science, vis-à-vis bibliometric indicators. Moreover, some basic features of the evaluation process are discussed, to understand their usefulness for reinforcing the effectiveness of the peers' final outcome. (literal)
- Prodotto di
- Autore CNR
- Insieme di parole chiave
Incoming links:
- Autore CNR di
- Prodotto
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
- Insieme di parole chiave di