Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2015-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Paglieri, Fabio (2015)
    Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory
    in Informal logic
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Paglieri, Fabio (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 65 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 87 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4209/3382 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 35 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 23 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 1 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • ISTC-CNR Roma (literal)
Titolo
  • Bogency and goodacies: On argument quality in virtue argumentation theory (literal)
Abstract
  • Virtue argumentation theory (VAT) has been charged of being incomplete, given its alleged inability to account for argument cogency in virtue-theoretical terms. Instead of defending VAT against that challenge, I suggest it is misplaced, since it is based on a premise VAT does not endorse, and raises an issue that most versions of VAT need not consider problematic. This in turn allows distinguishing several varieties of VAT, and clarifying what really matters for them. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Autore CNR di
Prodotto
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it