Intercomparison of Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Mercury Species (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Intercomparison of Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Mercury Species (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2001-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Munthe J, Wangberg I, Pirrone N, Iverfeld A, Ferrara R, Ebinghaus R, Feng X, Gardfelt K, Keeler GJ, Lanzillotta E, Lindberg SE, Lu J, Mamane Y, Prestbo E, Schmolke S, Schroeder WH, Sommar J, Sprovieri F, Stevens RK, Stratton W, Tuncel G, Urba A (2001)
    Intercomparison of Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Mercury Species
    in Atmospheric environment (1994)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Munthe J, Wangberg I, Pirrone N, Iverfeld A, Ferrara R, Ebinghaus R, Feng X, Gardfelt K, Keeler GJ, Lanzillotta E, Lindberg SE, Lu J, Mamane Y, Prestbo E, Schmolke S, Schroeder WH, Sommar J, Sprovieri F, Stevens RK, Stratton W, Tuncel G, Urba A (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 3007 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 3017 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 35 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 18 (literal)
Note
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • 1 IVL, 2 IVL, 3 CNR-IIA, 4 IVL, 5 CNR-IB, 6 GKSS, 7 ICD, 8 ICD, 9 UoM, 10 CNR-IB, 11 ESD, 12 AES, 13 EWRE, 14 FG, 15 GKSS, 16 AES, 17 ICD, 18 CNR-IIA, 19 DEP-USEPA, 20 DCEC, 21 METU, 22 IP (literal)
Titolo
  • Intercomparison of Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Mercury Species (literal)
Abstract
  • An intercomparison for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species was held in Tuscany, June 1998.Methods for sampling and analysis of total gaseous mercury (TGM), reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) and totalparticulate mercury (TPM) were used in parallel sampling over a period of 4 days. The results show that the differentmethods employed for TGM compared well whereas RGM and TPM showed a somewhat higher variability.Measurement results of RGM and TPM improved over the time period indicating that activities at the sampling siteduring set-up and initial sampling affected the results. Especially the TPM measurement results were affected.Additional parallel sampling was performed for two of the TPM methods under more controlled conditions whichyielded more comparable results. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it