How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements (Articolo in rivista)

Type

• Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)
• Articolo in rivista (Classe)

Label

• How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements (Articolo in rivista) (literal)

Anno

• 2009-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi

• 10.1039/b815240c (literal)

Alternative label

• Aggarwal J.; Böhm F.; Foster G.; Halas S.; Hönish B.; Jiang S.; Kosler J.; Liba A.; Rodushkin I.; Sheehan T., Shen J.J.S.; Tonarini S., Xie Q.; You C.F.; Zhao Z.Q.; and Zuleger E. (2009)
  How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements
  in Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry (Print)
  (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

• Aggarwal J.; Böhm F.; Foster G.; Halas S.; Hönish B.; Jiang S.; Kosler J.; Liba A.; Rodushkin I.; Sheehan T., Shen J.J.S.; Tonarini S., Xie Q.; You C.F.; Zhao Z.Q.; and Zuleger E. (literal)

Pagina inizio

• 825 (literal)

Pagina fine

• 831 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url

• http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Journals/JA/Index.asp (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

• 24 (literal)

Rivista

• Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry (Rivista)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#note

• In: Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, vol. 24 pp. 825 - 831. Royal Society of Chemistry, 2009. (literal)

Note

• ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

• Keck Isotope Laboratory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Leibniz-Institut f. Meereswissenschaften, IfM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstr., Germany, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Institute of Physics, Lublin, Poland, Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA, Department of Earth Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bergen, Begen, Norway, ICP Facility, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, USA, ALS Scandinavia, Lulea, Sweden, Regional Toxicology Laboratory, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK, Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, CNR-IGG, Pisa, Water Quality Centre, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada, Department of Earth Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Europasche Kommission, Institut fur Transurane,Karlsruhe, Germany (literal)

Titolo

• How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements (literal)

Abstract

• In order to address the correct reporting and therefore comparison of isotopic measurements across different instrument types and instrumental techniques a prepared set of synthetic standards was sent to 28 laboratories for boron (B) isotopic analyses. Standards were prepared from enriched and purified isotopic salts to avoid any sample preparation fractionation. The range in uncertainties of the analyses between different instrumental analytical techniques is as large as the differences within an instrumental analytical technique obscuring any systematic offset. We conclude that uncertainties in the measurement of d11B values were often underestimated and a procedure is suggested to allow a better comparison of the different techniques. Two new standards (JABA and JABB) have been quantified and these are available to all laboratories for testing their analyses. The d11B values of these new standards are 10.0& and ?23.7&. The results from this exercise impact on the way all isotope measurements are performed and reported. Guidelines are defined to aid the comparison of measurements between different laboratories. (literal)

Prodotto di

• Studio della distribuzione degli elementi e degli isotopi nell'astenosfera, litosfera, idrosfera e atmosfera (TA.P05.014.002) (Modulo)
• Istituto di geoscienze e georisorse (IGG) (Istituto)

Autore CNR

• SONIA TONARINI (Unità di personale interno)

Insieme di parole chiave

• Keywords of "How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements" (Insieme di parole chiave)

Incoming links:

Prodotto

• Istituto di geoscienze e georisorse (IGG) (Istituto)
• Studio della distribuzione degli elementi e degli isotopi nell'astenosfera, litosfera, idrosfera e atmosfera (TA.P05.014.002) (Modulo)

Autore CNR di

• SONIA TONARINI (Unità di personale interno)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi

• Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry (Rivista)

Insieme di parole chiave di

• Keywords of "How well do non-traditional stable isotope results compare between different laboratories: results from the interlaboratory comparison of boron isotope measurements" (Insieme di parole chiave)