http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID262180

Caratteristiche fonetiche di soggetti a basso rischio neonatologico a 18, 21 e 27 mesi (Articolo in rivista)

Type

Label

Caratteristiche fonetiche di soggetti a basso rischio neonatologico a 18, 21 e 27 mesi (Articolo in rivista) (literal)

Anno

Alternative label

Bortolini Umberta*, Bonifacio Serena°, Zmarich Claudio°, Fior Renato° (1996)
Caratteristiche fonetiche di soggetti a basso rischio neonatologico a 18, 21 e 27 mesi
in Età evolutiva (Firenze); Giunti, Firenze (Italia)
(literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

Pagina inizio

Pagina fine

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

Rivista

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

* Centro di Studio per le Ricerche di Fonetica, C.N.R., Padova ° Servizio di Logopedia-Div. O.R.L., Istituto per l'Infanzia \"Burlo-Garofolo\", Trieste (literal)

Titolo

Caratteristiche fonetiche di soggetti a basso rischio neonatologico a 18, 21 e 27 mesi (literal)

Abstract

The phonetic inventories of the spontaneous, meaningful verbal production of three groups of children at 18, 21 and 27 months of chronological age are presented. The first group of children consists of 4 preterm children (< 36 weeks at birth, appropriate weight for gestational age), the second one consists of 4 small-for-gestational age at-term children and the final group comprise 4 appropriate-for-gestational age at-term children. Phonetic inventories were calculated according to the procedures proposed by Stoel-Gammon (1985) and by Ingram (1981). In the paper the two procedures are presented in detail, and compared. Generally speaking, Stoel-Gammon's procedure, counting the presence of a phone in two different words, is much easier to use and then it is recommended for clinical purpose, while Ingram's procedure, taking into account the size of individual vocabulary, is more correct in relating phonetic ability to lexical production. Furthermore, it allows to classify the relative frequencies of the phones. Applying the procedures to verbal productions of the three groups of children, we found that the phonetic inventory of the preterm children are narrower than the other two groups only at 18 months of age, and the differences disappear at 27 months of age. (literal)

Editore