http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID244666

Flow Control Systems for Mobile Applications (Contributo in atti di convegno)

Type

Contributo in atti di convegno (Classe)
Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)

Label

Flow Control Systems for Mobile Applications (Contributo in atti di convegno) (literal)

Anno

1997-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Alternative label

R. Paoluzzi, L. G. Zarotti, M. Poldi Allaj (1997)
Flow Control Systems for Mobile Applications
in 5th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP'97, Linkoeping, S, May, 28-30 1997
(literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

R. Paoluzzi, L. G. Zarotti, M. Poldi Allaj (literal)

Pagina inizio

365 (literal)

Pagina fine

381 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#titoloVolume

Proc.s del 5th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP'97, (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

I (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali

17 (literal)

Note

British Library Inside (literal)
Getinfo.de (literal)
TIB - German National Library of Science and Technology (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

CEMOTER - C.N.R. (literal)

Titolo

Flow Control Systems for Mobile Applications (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#isbn

9178719755 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#curatoriVolume

Palmberg, J.O. (literal)

Abstract

The contribution reports about some simulation studies carried out on three flow control systems used in mobile applications: a standard open centre system with 613 directional valves and fixed displacement pump (OC), a load sensing system with pressure compensated pump (LS), a closed centre system with variable setting pressure compensated pump (PC). The aim is to compare the relatively new PC system with the well established OC and LS systems. All systems have two parallel actuators (rotational) and are considered from three points of view: a) overall efficiency, which involves two different criteria: the power efficiency in a local sense (as ratio of steady state power terms), and the energy efficiency in a cyclic sense (as ratio of energy terms during a given time history); b) controllability and sensitivity, which involves the effect on the metered flow due to changes in actuator load (both resistive and overrunning) and directional valve displacement. When both actuators work, the cross effects are also considered; c) dynamic response, which involves the system behaviour when step inputs (both positive and negative) are applied to actuator load and directional valve position. The relevant response is qualified by means of the standard titles of merit (response time, rising time, overshoot, . ..). As to point a) the PC scheme is sometimes the best in the local sense, but the LS scheme seems always the best in the cyclic sense. As to point b) the PC scheme is about halfway between OC and LS; from the first it gets some large dead bands and high load sensitivities, from the second some large control ranges and favourable flow gains. As to point c) the PC scheme reacts smoothly, though with higher response times (literal)

Editore