Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills (Abstract/Comunicazione in atti di convegno)

Type

• Abstract/Comunicazione in atti di convegno (Classe)
• Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)

Label

• Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills (Abstract/Comunicazione in atti di convegno) (literal)

Anno

• 2011-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Alternative label

• Marini, C. ; Schino, G. (2011)
  Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills
  in 20th Meeting of the Italian Primatological Association, Bussolengo, 10-13 aprile 2011
  (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

• Marini, C. ; Schino, G. (literal)

Pagina inizio

• 259 (literal)

Pagina fine

• 259 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni

• ID_PUMA: /cnr.istc/2011-B6-013. - Area di valutazione 11 - Scienze storiche, filosofiche, psicologiche e pedagogiche (literal)

Rivista

• Folia primatologica (Rivista)

Note

• Abstract (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

• Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università Sapienza, Rome, Italy ; CNR-ISTC, Roma2-Bioparco (literal)

Titolo

• Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills (literal)

Abstract

• Group living animals employ various strategies to deal with the costs and conflicts of interests associated with social life. In nonhuman primates, the most common behaviour following aggressive conflicts is reconciliation. In this study we analysed the postconflict behaviour of a captive group of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx), a species whose social behaviour is still poorly known. Mandrills showed a differential use of contact and noncontact postconflict affiliation: the former was more frequent between kin and when the original aggressor was lower ranking than the victim, that is, with easily accessible individuals. Noncontact affiliation was preferred to reconcile with opponents having a high probability to renew aggression, that is, with the most dangerous ones. Both types of affiliation reduced the probability of renewed aggression. These results suggest mandrills are able to adopt flexible strategies according to the varying characteristics of their antagonists. (literal)

Prodotto di

• Modelli Biologici dei Sistemi Cognitivi (SV.P16.002.002) (Modulo)
• Institute of cognitive sciences and technologies (ISTC) (Istituto)

Autore CNR

• Gabriele Schino (Unità di personale esterno)

Insieme di parole chiave

• Parole chiave di "Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills" (Insieme di parole chiave)

Incoming links:

Prodotto

• Institute of cognitive sciences and technologies (ISTC) (Istituto)
• Modelli Biologici dei Sistemi Cognitivi (SV.P16.002.002) (Modulo)

Autore CNR di

• Gabriele Schino (Unità di personale esterno)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi

• Folia primatologica (Rivista)

Insieme di parole chiave di

• Parole chiave di "Differential Use of contact and Non-Contact Affiliation during Reconciliation in Mandrills" (Insieme di parole chiave)