http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID184853

Logic and Metaphysics in German Philosophy from Melanchthon to Hegel (Contributo in volume (capitolo o saggio))

Type

Label

Logic and Metaphysics in German Philosophy from Melanchthon to Hegel (Contributo in volume (capitolo o saggio)) (literal)

Anno

Alternative label

Pozzo, R. (2004)
Logic and Metaphysics in German Philosophy from Melanchthon to Hegel
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (Paesi Bassi) in Approaches to Metaphysics, 2004
(literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

Pagina inizio

Pagina fine

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni

Founded in 1979, the Studies in Philosophy and Religion series of Kulwer has a long-standing tradition of rigor and has been a reference for philosophers of religion alla over the world. The editor, William Sweet is currently the chair of Committee on Intercultural Philosophy of the Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie. (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#titoloVolume

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#volumeInCollana

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali

Note

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

Titolo

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#isbn

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autoriVolume

L. Dewan; R. Pozzo; R. Feist; K. Schmitz, D. Ahern; P. Harris; G. Satapathy; C. LePage; L. Armour, J. Bradley; F. O'Rourke; W.J. Mader; F. Wilson; M.M. Tweedale; E. Trott (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#curatoriVolume

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to focus on the distinction between logic and metaphysics in German philosophy from Philipp Melanchthon to G.W.F. Hegel. Its scope is a temporal route that goes from the Renaissance to the 19th century, and which exhibits a movement from one extreme to another. Thus, Melanchthon - owing to his nominalistic background - was in fact repelled by metaphysical forms and chose not to include metaphysics among the philosophical sciences. For him, metaphysics was to be identified with logic. On the other hand, Hegel was repelled by logical formalism and did not include logic among the philosophical sciences. For Hegel, logic was to be identified with metaphysics. While Melanchthon and Hegel are the subjects, respectively, of the first and last parts of this paper, the second, the third, and the fourth parts are dedicated to the understanding of the relationship between logic and metaphysics in the work of Scheibler, Leibniz and Kant. (literal)

Editore