http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID173198

The Epistemic Standpoint from Kant to Hegel (Articolo in rivista)

Type

Label

Anno

Alternative label

Pozzo R. (2007)
The Epistemic Standpoint from Kant to Hegel
in Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie; J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart (Germania)
(literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

Pagina inizio

Pagina fine

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

Rivista

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

Titolo

Abstract

The definition of an epistemic standpoint goes back to Aristotle's explanation in Analytica posteriora I, 27 of the role played by prósthesis in the passage from the »unity, which is a substance without position, to the point, which is a unity with a position: this passage is the result of a determination [ek prosthéseôs]« (87a34-36). The position of a determination (prósthesis can also be rendered with addition) or the lack thereof generates the haplôs (simpliciter) and ek prosthéseôs (secundum quid) distinction of Analytica priora I, 38 (49a12-49b33), whereby the secundum quid, i.e., the trópos epistêmês of Metaphysica I min., 3 (995a14-15) is the result of a determination by the knowing subject, in as far as he configures a domain of objects. In De anima III, 7 Aristotle states that a cognition in act is identical with its object (431a1) and in Ethica Nichomachea I, 7 makes the examples of the carpenter and the geometer looking at the same angle, the former being content with an approximation that satisfies the objectives of his work, while the latter, who is a student of truth, looks at its essence at essential attributes (1098a 29-42). (literal)

Editore