An analysis of product development process configurations where an a posteriori FE criterion improves simulation models consistency (Contributo in atti di convegno)

Type
Label
  • An analysis of product development process configurations where an a posteriori FE criterion improves simulation models consistency (Contributo in atti di convegno) (literal)
Anno
  • 2006-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Rosalinda Ferrandes, Jean Claude Leon, Philippe Marin, Franca Giannini (2006)
    An analysis of product development process configurations where an a posteriori FE criterion improves simulation models consistency
    in CIE 2006: ASME 2006 Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, USA, September 10-13, 2006,
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Rosalinda Ferrandes, Jean Claude Leon, Philippe Marin, Franca Giannini (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 1 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 10 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#titoloVolume
  • Proceedings of CIE 2006: ASME 2006 Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autoriCuratela
  • Ferrandes R., Léon J-C., Marin P., Giannini F. (literal)
Note
  • Scopu (literal)
  • Google Scholar (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Soils, Solids, Structures Laboratory, Integrated Design Project, UMR CNRS 5521 Domaine Universitaire BP 53 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9 France Institute of Applied Mathematics and Informatic Technologies CNR Genova Via De Marini 6 16149 Genova, Italy (literal)
Titolo
  • An analysis of product development process configurations where an a posteriori FE criterion improves simulation models consistency (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#inCollana
  • Proceedings of ASME 2006 Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (literal)
Abstract
  • A mechanical behavioural analysis can be useful at different stages of the product development process, and there are different scenarios where a FE (Finite Element) analysis can support the design phase. Unfortunately, preparing a model suitable for the FE analysis and solving a FE problem are time expensive and need a considerable involvement of simulation experts. In this paper, we analyze several scenarios of product development process, where an a posteriori criterion allows exploiting some existing FE analysis results. Their common denominator stands in the evaluation of the impact of the component shape modifications on the accuracy of existing FE results, by means of an a posteriori FE error indicator. It is computed using the stress and strain fields over the component. This indicator is targeted to determine whether a shape sub-domain has some influence over pre-existing FE analysis results, i.e. whether an accurate FE analysis needs to use a model including this sub-domain. Here, we will describe the input and output parameters of our a posteriori indicator and what are the requirements for its incorporation in the different scenarios. Each of the proposed scenarios will be analyzed and illustrated to identify its potentials and requirements. (literal)
Editore
Prodotto di
Autore CNR

Incoming links:


Autore CNR di
Prodotto
Editore di
data.CNR.it