http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID107631
Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: using the Weight of Evidence model with positive and negative evidences of contamination (Abstract/Poster in atti di convegno)
- Type
- Label
- Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: using the Weight of Evidence model with positive and negative evidences of contamination (Abstract/Poster in atti di convegno) (literal)
- Anno
- 2008-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
- Alternative label
Sorichetta A., Sterlacchini S., Poli S., Masetti M. & Blahut J. (2008)
Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: using the Weight of Evidence model with positive and negative evidences of contamination
in EGU - European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, 13-18 Aprile 2008
(literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
- Sorichetta A., Sterlacchini S., Poli S., Masetti M. & Blahut J. (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#titoloVolume
- Proceedings of EGU - European Geosciences Union (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#volumeInCollana
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#note
- Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 10, EGU2008-A-12310 (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
- Note
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
- Sorichetta A. - Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra «Ardito Desio», Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia
Sterlacchini S. - CNR - Istituto per la Dinamica dei Processi Ambientali (sezione di Milano), Milano, Italia
Poli S. - Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Ambiente e del Territorio, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Italia
Masetti M. - Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra «Ardito Desio», Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia
Blahut J. - Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Ambiente e del Territorio, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Italia (literal)
- Titolo
- Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment: using the Weight of Evidence model with positive and negative evidences of contamination (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autoriVolume
- AA:VV. - International Scientific Committee of EGU (literal)
- Abstract
- Using the WofE, a data-driven Bayesian-probabilistic modeling technique, a groundwater
vulnerability assessment to nitrate (NO-
3 ) contamination has been performed
in the aquifer of the Province of Milan (northern Italy). The occurrence of elevated
nitrate concentration in the study area is constantly monitored by a net of about 200
wells.
The WofE calculates the weighted relationship between hydrogeologicalanthropogenic
factors (explanatory variables) that influence the aquifer vulnerability
and groundwater nitrate concentration in the wells used as training points (response
variable) to run the model.
The use of this model requires to express the response variable as binary with the
necessity to establish a threshold value of concentration which separates the data set
in two subsets. The conventional approach is to use only the subsets containing wells
with concentration higher than the threshold value as training points in the analysis.
In fact in groundwater vulnerability problems this subset represents the number and
location of the events (where groundwater has been strongly impacted from contamination).
One obvious limit of this approach is that an entire subsets, the one individuating
areas where groundwater has been slightly impacted from contamination,
is completely neglected. In this study the threshold value of concentration has been
calculated by simple statistical analysis and both the subsets of data served as training
points to run two different WofE models. This was done to avoid losing important
information on experimental data and to better describe the aquifer vulnerability by
directly considering the importance of factors which are related not only to high values
of groundwater contamination but also to low values.
The influence in the final outputs due to the use of the two different training point sets
has been evaluated comparing the spatial distribution of the resulting vulnerability
classes. For both models the obtained weighted relationships between the explanatory
variables and response variable have also been investigated highlighting the main
difference in the results. (literal)
- Editore
- Prodotto di
- Autore CNR
Incoming links:
- Prodotto
- Autore CNR di
- Editore di