http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID10030
Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals (Articolo in rivista)
- Type
- Label
- Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
- Anno
- 2002-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
- Alternative label
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
- Proverbio A.M.1, Cok B.1, Zani A.2 (literal)
- Pagina inizio
- Pagina fine
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni
- Secondo Google Scholar e ISI of WEB, al 27 Maggio 2013 l'articolo ha avuto 62 citazioni. (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
- Rivista
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
- Note
- Scopu (literal)
- Google Scholar (literal)
- ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
- PubMed (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
- 1. Univ Trieste
2. Istituto di Neuroscienze e Bioimmagini CNR (literal)
- Titolo
- Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals (literal)
- Abstract
- The aim of the present study was to investigate how multiple languages are
represented in the human brain. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were
recorded from right-handed polyglots and monolinguals during a task
involving silent reading. The participants in the experiment were nine
Italian monolinguals and nine Italian/Slovenian bilinguals of a Slovenian
minority in Trieste; the bilinguals, highly fluent in both languages, had
spoken both languages since birth. The stimuli were terminal words that
would correctly complete a short, meaningful, previously shown sentence,
or else were semantically or syntactically incorrect. The task consisted
in deciding whether the sentences were well formed or not, giving the
response by pressing a button. Both groups read the same set of 200
Italian sentences to compare the linguistic processing, while the
bilinguals also received a set of 200 Slovenian sentences, comparable in
complexity and length, to compare the processing of the two languages
within the group. For the bilinguals, the ERP results revealed a strong,
left-sided activation, reflected by the N1 component, of the
occipitotemporal regions dedicated to orthographic processing, with a
latency of about 150 msec for Slovenian words, but bilateral activation of
the same areas for Italian words, which was also displayed by
topographical mapping. In monolinguals, semantic error produced a long-
lasting negative response (N2 and N4) that was greater over the right
hemisphere, whereas syntactic error activated mostly the left hemisphere.
Conversely, in the bilinguals, semantic incongruence resulted in greater
response over the left hemisphere than over the right. In this group, the
P615 syntactical error responses were of equal amplitude on both
hemispheres for Italian words and greater on the right side for Slovenian
words. The present findings support the view that there are interand
intrahemispheric brain activation asymmetries when monolingual and
bilingual speakers comprehend written language. The fact that the
bilingual speakers in the present study were highly fluent and had
acquired both languages in early infancy suggests that the brain
activation patterns do not depend on the age of acquisition or the fluency
level, as in the case of late, not-so-proficient L2 language learners, but
on the functional organization of the bilinguals' brain due to polyglotism
and based on brain plasticity. (literal)
- Prodotto di
- Autore CNR
Incoming links:
- Autore CNR di
- Prodotto
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi