Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2006-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Roberta Ferrario (2006)
    Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies
    in Epistemologia (Testo stamp.); Tilgher-Genova, Genova (Italia)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Roberta Ferrario (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 323 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 342 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 2 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#note
  • in corso di pubblicazione (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 19 (literal)
Note
  • Google Scholar (literal)
  • Scopu (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • ISTC - Sede di Trento (literal)
Titolo
  • Who Cares about Axiomatization? Representation, Invariance, and Formal Ontologies (literal)
Abstract
  • The philosophy of science of Patrick Suppes is centered on two important notions that are part of the title of his recent book (Suppes 2002): Representation and Invariance. Representation is important because when we embrace a theory we implicitly choose a way to represent the phenomenon we are studying. Invariance is important because, since invariants are the only things that are constant in a theory, in a way they give the \"objective\" meaning of that theory. Every scientific theory gives a representation of a class of structures and studies the invariant properties holding in that class of structures. In Suppes' view, the best way to define this class of structures is via axiomatization. This is because a class of structures is given by a definition, and this same definition establishes which are the properties that a single structure must possess in order to belong to the class. These properties correspond to the axioms of a logical theory. In Suppes' view, the best way to characterize a scientific structure is by giving a representation theorem for its models and singling out the invariants in the structure. Thus, we can say that the philosophy of science of Patrick Suppes consists in the application of the axiomatic method to scientific disciplines. What I want to argue in this paper is that this application of the axiomatic method is also at the basis of a new approach that is being increasingly applied to the study of computer science and information systems, namely the approach of formal ontologies. The main task of an ontology is that of making explicit the conceptual structure underlying a certain domain. By \"making explicit the conceptual structure\" we mean singling out the most basic entities populating the domain and writing axioms expressing the main properties of these primitives and the relations holding among them. So, in both cases, the axiomatization is the main tool used to characterize the object of inquiry, being this object scientific theories (in Suppes' approach), or information systems1 (for formal ontologies). In the following section I will present the view of Patrick Suppes on the philosophy of science and the axiomatic method, in section 3 I will survey the theoretical issues underlying the work that is being done in formal ontologies and in section 4 I will draw a comparison of these two approaches and explore similarities and differences between them. (literal)
Editore
Prodotto di
Autore CNR

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Editore di
data.CNR.it