Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2004-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1364/AO.43.000961 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Matthias V; Freudenthaler V; Amodeo A; Balin I; Balis D; Bosenberg J; Chaikovsky A; Chourdakis G; Comeron A; Delaval A; De Tomasi F; Eixmann R; Hagard A; Komguem L; Kreipl S; Matthey R; Rizi V; Rodrigues JA; Wandinger U; Wang X (2004)
    Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments
    in Applied optics; optical society of america, Washington (Stati Uniti d'America)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Matthias V; Freudenthaler V; Amodeo A; Balin I; Balis D; Bosenberg J; Chaikovsky A; Chourdakis G; Comeron A; Delaval A; De Tomasi F; Eixmann R; Hagard A; Komguem L; Kreipl S; Matthey R; Rizi V; Rodrigues JA; Wandinger U; Wang X (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 961 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 976 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#altreInformazioni
  • The presented version is the corrected version oft the publication [Appl. Opt. 43, 961 (2004)], One of the figures on page 973 was presented inaccurately, as was the surname of the first author. The previous is the version that presents about 120 citations in Scopus and about 90 citations in WoS. It is important to consider both. Both version of the paper have been attached. In the following the reference together with WoS and Scopus id numbers of the first version: V. Matthias, J. Bösenberg, V. Freudenthaler, A. Amodeo, D. Balis, A. Chaikovsky, G. Chourdakis, A. Comeron, A. Delaval, F. de Tomasi, R. Eixmann, A. Hågård, L. Komguem, S. Kreipl, R. Matthey, I. Mattis, V. Rizi, J.A. Rodriguez, V. Simeonov, X. Wang, \"Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments\", Appl. Opt. 43, N. 4, 961-976, 2004. (Erratum: 961-964) WOS:000188510900033 Scopus: 2-s2.0-10744225863 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 43 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 4 (literal)
Note
  • Scopu (literal)
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Max-Planck-Institut fur Meteorologie, Bundesstrasse 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; Meteorologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians--Universitat Munchen, Theresienstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany; Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Ambientale, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Contrada S. Loja, 85050 Tito Scalo _Potenza_,Italy; Laboratoire de Pollution de l'Air et du Sol, E´ cole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Box 149, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; Max-Planck- Institut fur Meteorologie, Bundesstrasse 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Physics National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 68 F. Scarina Avenue, 220072 Minsk, Belarus; Department of Physics, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon Polytechniou 9, 15780 Zografou, Greece; Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Jordi Girona 1 y 3. Edif. D3-202, 08034 Barcelona, Spain; Institute Pierre Simone Laplace, Laboratoire de la Meteorologie Dynamique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France; Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia, Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita´ di Lecce, via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy; Leibniz-Institut fur Atmospharenphysik, Schlossstrasse 6, 18225 Kuhlungsborn, Germany; Division of Sensor Technology, Swedish Defence Research Agency, P.O. Box 1165, 58111 Linkoping, Sweden; Department of Physics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Ceredigion SY23 3BZ, UK; Institut fur Meteorologie und Klimaforschung, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Kreuzeckbahnstrasse 19, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; Observatoire de Neuchatel, Rue de l'Observatoire 58, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland; Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita´ degli Studi--L'Aqulia, Via Vetoio Localita´ Coppito, 67010 L'Aqulia, Italy; Centro de F?sica de Plasmas, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal; Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04303 Leipzig, Germany; Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, via Cintia, 80126 Naples, Italy. Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research Center, Max-Planck-Strass 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. (literal)
Titolo
  • Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments (literal)
Abstract
  • In the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology (EARLINET), 19 aerosol lidar systems from 11 European countries were compared. Aerosol extinction or backscatter coefficient profiles were measured by at least two systems for each comparison. Aerosol extinction coefficients were derived from Raman lidar measurements in the UV (351 or 355 nm), and aerosol backscatter profiles were calculated from pure elastic backscatter measurements at 351 or 355, 532, or 1064 nm. The results were compared for height ranges with high and low aerosol content. Some systems were additionally compared with sunphotometers and starphotometers. Predefined maximum deviations were used for quality control of the results. Lidar systems with results outside those limits could not meet the quality assurance criterion. The algorithms for deriving aerosol backscatter profiles from elastic lidar measurements were tested separately, and the results are described in Part 2 of this series of papers [Appl. Opt. 43, 977-989 (2004)]. In the end, all systems were quality assured, although some had to be modified to improve their performance. Typical deviations between aerosol backscatter profiles were 10% in the planetary boundary layer and 0.1 X 10(-6) m(-1) sr(-1) in the free troposphere. (C) 2004 Optical Society of America (literal)
  • This is the abstract of the previous publication [Appl. Opt. 43, 961 (2004)]. the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network to Establish an Aerosol Climatology _EARLINET_, 19 aerosol lidar systems from 11 European countries were compared. Aerosol extinction or backscatter coefficient profiles were measured by at least two systems for each comparison. Aerosol extinction coefficients were derived from Raman lidar measurements in the UV _351 or 355 nm_, and aerosol backscatter profiles were calculated from pure elastic backscatter measurements at 351 or 355, 532, or 1064 nm. The results were compared for height ranges with high and low aerosol content. Some systems were additionally compared with sunphotometers and starphotometers. Predefined maximum deviations were used for quality control of the results. Lidar systems with results outside those limits could not meet the quality assurance criterion. The algorithms for deriving aerosol backscatter profiles from elastic lidar measurements were tested separately, and the results are described in Part 2 of this series of papers _Appl. Opt. 43, 977-989 _2004__. In the end, all systems were quality assured, although some had to be modified to improve their performance. Typical deviations between aerosol backscatter profiles were 10% in the planetary boundary layer and 0.1 _ 10_6 m_1 sr_1 in the free troposphere (literal)
Editore
Prodotto di
Autore CNR

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Editore di
data.CNR.it