Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation (Articolo in rivista)

Type

• Articolo in rivista (Classe)
• Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)

Label

• Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation (Articolo in rivista) (literal)

Anno

• 2014-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Alternative label

• Mohr, Richard and Contini, Francesco (2014)
  Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation
  in Oñati socio-legal series
  (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

• Mohr, Richard and Contini, Francesco (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url

• http://ssrn.com/abstract=2537860 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

• 4 (literal)

Rivista

• Oñati socio-legal series (Rivista)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo

• 5 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

• University of Wollongong IRSIG-CNR (literal)

Titolo

• Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation (literal)

Abstract

• This article explores the proper role of judicial evaluation in relation to the various branches of government and a range of disciplines. Judicial evaluation is a practical, interpretive sphere of inquiry, based on dialogue and collaboration. It must respect important shared values, based on human rights and dignity, responsible approaches to research, and the conservation of resources. After outlining two contrasting approaches, from the European Commission and from Sweden, the article considers the roles of politics and knowledge or science (broadly defined) in judicial evaluation. Then nine values are enunciated, based on the common heritage of courts, government and scientific research. In the practice of judicial evaluation, meaningful data must be collected, reported clearly and interpreted transparently in dialogue with stakeholders. Conclusions should be consistent with the shared values, derived from honest arguments and communicated effectively. Researchers should be impartial, treat participants with equal dignity and respect their rights to privacy. Judicial evaluation must be useful in improving the administration of justice, without wasting time or resources of the courts or researchers. Este art (literal)

Prodotto di

• Qualità e valutazione dei sistemi giudiziari (IC.P06.018.001) (Modulo)

Autore CNR

• FRANCESCO CONTINI (Unità di personale interno)

Incoming links:

Autore CNR di

• FRANCESCO CONTINI (Unità di personale interno)

Prodotto

• Qualità e valutazione dei sistemi giudiziari (IC.P06.018.001) (Modulo)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi

• Oñati socio-legal series (Rivista)