How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2014-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1007/s00426-014-0622-0 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Flumini, Andrea; Barca, Laura; Borghi, Anna Maria; Pezzulo, Giovanni (2014)
    How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size
    in Psychological research (Print)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Flumini, Andrea; Barca, Laura; Borghi, Anna Maria; Pezzulo, Giovanni (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-84908302019&origin=inward (literal)
Rivista
Note
  • Scopu (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna; Istituto Di Scienze E Tecnologie Della Cognizione, Rome (literal)
Titolo
  • How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size (literal)
Abstract
  • In keeping with the idea that observing objects activates possible motor responses, several experiments revealed compatibility effects between the hand postures used to report a choice and some characteristics of the stimuli. The real-time dynamics of such compatibility effects are currently unknown. We tracked the time course of a categorization experiment requiring subjects to categorize as natural or artifact figures of big and small objects. Participants reported their choice using either a big mouse (requiring a power grip: a hand posture compatible with the grasping of big objects) or a small mouse (requiring a precision grip: a hand posture compatible with the grasping of small objects). We found a compatibility effect between the grip required by the mouse and the grip elicited by objects, even if it was irrelevant to the task. In a following experiment with the same paradigm, lexical stimuli failed to reproduce the same effect. Nevertheless, a compatibility effect mediated by the target-word category (artificial vs. natural) was observed. We discuss the results in the context of affordance effects literature and grounded theories of cognition. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR

Incoming links:


Autore CNR di
Prodotto
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
data.CNR.it