Comparing terrain and roadside chipping in mediterranean pine salvage cuts (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Comparing terrain and roadside chipping in mediterranean pine salvage cuts (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2011-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Marchi E.; Magagnotti N.; Berretti L.; Neri F.; Spinelli R. (2011)
    Comparing terrain and roadside chipping in mediterranean pine salvage cuts
    in Croatian journal of forest engineering
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Marchi E.; Magagnotti N.; Berretti L.; Neri F.; Spinelli R. (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 587 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 598 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84864799183&partnerID=q2rCbXpz (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 32 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 2 (literal)
Note
  • Scopu (literal)
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • DEISTAF University of Florence, Via S. Bonaventura 13, I-50145 Firenze, Italy; CNR IVALSA, Via Madonna del Piano 10, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy (literal)
Titolo
  • Comparing terrain and roadside chipping in mediterranean pine salvage cuts (literal)
Abstract
  • In central Italy, the increasing demand for fuel chips and the epidemic spread of maritime pine bast scale have favored the development of large-scale industrial logging operations. After years of extensive commercial trials, local operators have developed their own industrial harvesting systems, through a wise mix of Scandinavian and North American methods. The result is original and effective, and allows keeping harvesting cost below 20 EUR gt -1. The study compared terrain chipping with roadside chipping, as applied to the coastal pine stands of Tuscany. Under the conditions of our study, roadside chipping was over four times more productive than terrain chipping, and it allowed reducing harvesting cost by one third (12.3 vs. 18.3 EUR gt -1). Despite the intense use of diesel, total fossil energy inputs accounted for less than 3% of the potential energy in the wood chips. Terrain chipping and roadside chipping yielded 36 and 47 times the energy they used, respectively. The coexistence of the two systems was most interesting. The harvesting systems described in the study perform best in clear-cuts, but they can also work in partial cuts, including thinning operations. They are actually used in thinnings in the same Regional Park of San Rossore, although their productivity is lower than in clear-cuts. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Autore CNR di
Prodotto
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it