http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID200676

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. (Articolo in rivista)

Type

Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)
Articolo in rivista (Classe)

Label

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. (Articolo in rivista) (literal)

Anno

2012-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi

10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.002 (literal)

Alternative label

Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Pelka M, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2012)
Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
in Dental materials
(literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

Taschner M, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Pelka M, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (literal)

Pagina inizio

535 (literal)

Pagina fine

540 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume

28 (literal)

Rivista

Dental materials (Rivista)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo

5 (literal)

Note

ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
Scopu (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

Dental Clinic 1 - Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Medical Center Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Glückstraße 11, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany; Department of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany; Department of Medical Sciences, Unit of Dental Sciences and Biomaterials, University of Trieste, Trieste and IGM-CNR, Unit of Bologna c/o IOR, Bologna, Italy; Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany (literal)

Titolo

Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study. (literal)

Abstract

Objectives: Aim of the present prospective controlled clinical study was to compare the clinical performances of two different cementation procedures to lute IPS Empress inlays and onlays. Methods: Eighty-three IPS Empress restorations (70 class-II inlays, 13 onlays/47 premolars, 36 molars) were placed in 30 patients (19 females/11 males, mean age = 39 years). Two cementation procedures were tested: group 1: forty-three restorations were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem, RX, 3M ESPE); group 2: forty restorations were luted with an etch-and-rinse multistep adhesive (Syntac Classic, Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Variolink II low (SV, Ivoclar-Vivadent). All restorations were evaluated after 2 weeks (baseline = 1st recall = R1, n = 83), 6 months (R2, n = 83), 1 year (R3, n = 82), and 2 years (R4, n = 82) by two independent blinded calibrated examiners using modified USPHS criteria. Results: From R1 to R4, one failure occurred in the SV group (at R2) due to marginal enamel chipping. After 2 years of clinical service (R4), better marginal and tooth integrity (p < 0.05) was found in group 2 (SV) compared to the use of the self-adhesive cement (RX, group 1), while no differences were found for all remaining investigated criteria (p > 0.05). The absence of enamel in proximal boxes (10% with no enamel and 51% of the restorations with less than 0.5 mm enamel width at the bottom of the proximal box) did not affect marginal performance (p > 0.05). Significance: The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem showed clinical outcomes similar to a conventional multi-step cementation procedure after 2 years of clinical service for most of the tested criteria. © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (literal)

Prodotto di