Comparison Of Three Methods For Hydrofacies Simulation: A Test On Alluvial Sediments (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • Comparison Of Three Methods For Hydrofacies Simulation: A Test On Alluvial Sediments (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2012-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1007/s10040-011-0808-0 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Dell'arciprete, D., Bersezio, R., Felletti, F., Giudici, M., Comunian, A., And Ph. Renard (2012)
    Comparison Of Three Methods For Hydrofacies Simulation: A Test On Alluvial Sediments
    in Hydrogeology journal
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Dell'arciprete, D., Bersezio, R., Felletti, F., Giudici, M., Comunian, A., And Ph. Renard (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 299 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 311 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://members.unine.ch/philippe.renard/articles/dellarciprete2011.pdf (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 20/2 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 13 (literal)
Note
  • ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
  • Scopus (literal)
  • Google Scholar (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra \"A. Desio\", Università degli Studi di Milano, via Cicognara 7, 20129 Milano, Italy Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra \"A. Desio\", Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli 34, 20133 Milano, Italy R. Bersezio Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra \"A. Desio\", Università degli Studi di Milano, CNR - IDPA, via Mangiagalli 34, 20133 Milano, Italy Centre of Hydrogeology and Geothermics, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile Argand, 11, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland (literal)
Titolo
  • Comparison Of Three Methods For Hydrofacies Simulation: A Test On Alluvial Sediments (literal)
Abstract
  • The hydrodispersive properties of porous sediments are strongly influenced by the heterogeneity at fine scales, which can be modeled by geostatistical simulations. In order to improve the assessment of the properties of three different geostatistical simulation methods (Sequential indicator simulation, SISIM; Transition probability geostatistical simulation, T-PROGS; Multiple point simulation, MPS) a comparison test at different scales was performed for a well-exposed aquifer analogue. In the analysed volume (approximately 30,000m 3 ) four operative hydrofacies have been recognised: very fine sand and silt, sand, gravelly sand and open framework gravel. Several equiprobable realizations were computed with SISIM, MPS and T-PROGS for a test volume of approximately 400m 3 and for the entire volume, and the different outcomes were compared with visual inspection and connectivity analysis of the very or poorly permeable structures. The comparison of the different simulations shows that the geological model is best reproduced when the simulations are realised separately for each highest rank depositional element and subsequently merged. Moreover, the three methods yield different images of the volume; in particular MPS is efficient in mapping the geometries of the most represented hydrofacies, whereas SISIM and T-PROGS can account for the distribution of the less represented facies. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
data.CNR.it