The reasons of scientists mobility: results from the comparison of outgoing and ingoing fluxes of researchers in Italy (Rapporti tecnici/preprint/working paper)

Type
Label
  • The reasons of scientists mobility: results from the comparison of outgoing and ingoing fluxes of researchers in Italy (Rapporti tecnici/preprint/working paper) (literal)
Anno
  • 2011-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Maria Carolina Brandi, Sveva Avveduto, Loredana Cerbara (2011)
    The reasons of scientists mobility: results from the comparison of outgoing and ingoing fluxes of researchers in Italy
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Maria Carolina Brandi, Sveva Avveduto, Loredana Cerbara (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 1 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 16 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#url
  • http://www.almalaurea.it/universita/pubblicazioni/wp (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#volumeInCollana
  • 44 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 16 (literal)
Note
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economic (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • IRPPS - Istituto di ricerche sulla popolazione e le politiche sociali (literal)
Titolo
  • The reasons of scientists mobility: results from the comparison of outgoing and ingoing fluxes of researchers in Italy (literal)
Abstract
  • To respond to the growing demands being placed on science to come up with solutions for socioeconomic problems, as well as by the increasing interchange between the world of research and technological innovation in systems of production, the most industrialized countries find themselves in need of an ever-larger number of highly qualified people to engage in research work and the international mobility of scientists is now a priority area of interest. In this framework, the IRPPS/CNR finalised, in 2001, a questionnaire designed to mine information about foreigners engaged in research in Italy. The questionnaire was addressed to all foreign researchers employed in Italian public research institutes and was answered by 64% of them. Given the rather small number of subjects involved in the survey, we was only able to make inferences about some very general tendencies. Even so, they are interesting, since the numerical presence of foreign researchers was not proportionately negligible with respect to the total number of researchers in Italian public research institutes. This survey therefore demonstrates that these institutes were securely connected to the international circuit of scientists and allowed us to recognize some of the main reasons of these peculiar migrations. However, the intake of foreign researchers in Italy is far lower than the outflow of Italian researchers abroad, though the dimension of the last flux is extremely hard to be determined, since no reliable statistical records are collected on this topic. Because of this reason, we recently started a new survey dedicated to the Italian researchers working abroad. Being their total number unknown, we are using the \"snowball sampling\" method in order to reach the highest number of subjects. The starting sample was taken from the DAVINCI data-base, available on the web site of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and composed by data voluntarily in by about 2000 Italian researchers working abroad, including their location, present institution, research interest and others. All the registered scientists were asked by e-mail to fulfil a questionnaire, basically equal to the one used for the previous survey on the foreign researchers working in Italy, and to diffuse the same questionnaire between their Italian colleagues they know to work abroad. Though this research is just started, its preliminary results seem to confirm the findings of the previous one concerning the reasons of what we might call the \"natural mobility\" of researchers: when scientists move abroad, they are generally motivated by a desire to engage in quality work. Accordingly, the prestige of the host institute, the equipment it puts at their disposition and the working environment are determining factors, whereas other considerations that are very important to other professionals, such as economic compensation, are less important. However, our survey came across several major similarities: both groups were far more disposed to temporary rather than permanent migration; furthermore, scientific migration, in common with other forms of skilled migration, is considerably influenced by the attitudes towards foreigners not only of the immediate working environment, but of the potential host society as a whole. By the way, our surveys also revealed a basic difference between the outgoing and ingoing fluxes of researchers in Italy: while the large majority of foreign scientists working in Italy plan to come back home, the largest share of the interviewees Italian researchers working abroad do not will to do the same. In both cases, the chief reasons for the scientist's reluctance to settle in Italy can be ascribed to the unlikelihood of permanent contracts of employment and the poor prospects for career advancement in Italian public research institutes, universities and companies. This unfortunate situation, jeopardizing the Italian capability to compete in the present day knowledge based economy, is also confirmed by the results that we gathered from the analysis of the subsamples of Italian graduates working abroad from the 2007 yearly AlmaLaurea Survey on Italian Graduates' Employment Conditions. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it