PCDD/Fsremoval efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant (Articolo in rivista)

Type
Label
  • PCDD/Fsremoval efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
Anno
  • 2009-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#doi
  • 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.019 (literal)
Alternative label
  • Ettore Guerriero; Alessandra Guarnieri; Silvia Mosca; Gianluca Rossetti; Mauro Rotatori (2009)
    PCDD/Fsremoval efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant
    in Journal of hazardous materials (Print)
    (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
  • Ettore Guerriero; Alessandra Guarnieri; Silvia Mosca; Gianluca Rossetti; Mauro Rotatori (literal)
Pagina inizio
  • 1498 (literal)
Pagina fine
  • 1504 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
  • 172 (literal)
Rivista
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali
  • 7 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroFascicolo
  • 2-3 (literal)
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
  • Istituto sull'Inquinamento Atmosferico (literal)
Titolo
  • PCDD/Fsremoval efficiency by electrostatic precipitator and wetfine scrubber in an iron ore sintering plant (literal)
Abstract
  • This study investigates the removal efficiency of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) by theAPCDsof an iron ore sintering plant, an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and a wetfine scrubbing system (WS). The removal efficiencies of the ESP on the total PCDD/Fs concentration and the total PCDD/Fs I-TEQ concentration are 44.3% and 41.4%, respectively, while those of the WS are 66.7% and 68.4%, respectively, but the vapor/solid phase distribution changes after APCDs abatement. At ESP inlet, the PCDD/Fs account for 31.2% in vapor phase and for 68.8% in particulate phase while, at ESP outlet, the PCDD/Fs account for 63.3% in vapor phase and for 36.7% in solid phase. The ESP removes effectively solid-phase PCDD/Fs for its effectiveness to capture the particulate while it is ineffective in removing vapor-phase PCDD/Fs. It, on the contrary, increase for the vaporization within the ESP, especially for these congeners with a lower chlorination degree, and for the PCDD/Fs \"stripping\" from particulate to gas-phase during the sampling. AtWSinlet, the PCDD/Fs account for 63.3% in vapor phase and for 36.7% in solid phase while, atWSoutlet, the PCDD/Fs account for 21.4% in vapor phase and for 78.6% in solid phase. Considering thatWSoutlet temperature is about 40 oC, the PCDD/Fs vapor-phase condense to particles: therefore, even if the particulate is removed by WS, the final result is that PCDD/Fs percentage decreases in vapor-phase and increases in solid-phase. (literal)
Prodotto di
Autore CNR
Insieme di parole chiave

Incoming links:


Prodotto
Autore CNR di
Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
Insieme di parole chiave di
data.CNR.it