Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning (Contributo in atti di convegno)

Type

• Prodotto della ricerca (Classe)
• Contributo in atti di convegno (Classe)

Label

• Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning (Contributo in atti di convegno) (literal)

Anno

• 2006-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)

Alternative label

• Allegra M., Fulantelli G., Pipitone V. (2006)
  Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning
  in Fifth International Congress on Higher Education - UNIVERSIDAD 2006 - I Conferencia Internacional "La Virtualización en la Educación Superior", Havana (Cuba), 13-17 february 2006
  (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori

• Allegra M., Fulantelli G., Pipitone V. (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#titoloVolume

• Proceedings of Fifth International Congress on Higher Education - UNIVERSIDAD 2006 - I Conferencia Internacional \"La Virtualización en la Educación Superior\" (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#pagineTotali

• 8 (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#descrizioneSinteticaDelProdotto

• The issue of quality in Distance Learning is one of the most debated topics at an international level, from the point of view both of research and regulations. In fact, e-learning requires innovative approaches and changes in the university system, and this transformation must be guided by specific rules in order to guarantee high standards of educational quality. During the last few years, in Italy the number of on line courses at university has grown rapidly, highlighting the problems of their certification and, above all, of their quality. In Italy a decree issued by the Ministry of Instruction, University, and Research in 2003, tried to set out some guidelines concerning some technological and methodological criteria which on line courses should follow. Similar initiatives have been activated in other contexts (e.g. in continuous distance learning courses in medicine) stressing different aspects of e-learning processes and highlighting the complexity of the topic. Besides, in a study carried out by our Institute we observed the perception of quality that students have concerning university on line courses. In this paper we compare the different perspectives, highlighting the main differences found. (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni

• Allegra Mario, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per le tecnologie didattiche, sede di Palermo. Fulantelli Giovanni, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per le tecnologie didattiche, sede di Palermo. Vito Pipitone, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per l'Ambiente Marino Costiero, sede di Mazara del Vallo. (literal)

Titolo

• Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning (literal)

Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#isbn

• 959-0282-08-3 (literal)

Abstract

• The issue of quality in Distance Learning is one of the most debated topics at an international level, from the point of view both of research and regulations. In fact, elearning requires innovative approaches and changes in the university system, and this transformation must be guided by specific rules in order to guarantee high standards of educational quality. During the last few years, in ltaly the number of on line courses at university has grown rapidly, highlighting the problems of their certification and, above all, of their quality. In ltaly a decree issued by the Ministry of Instruction, University, and Research in 2003, tried to set out some guidelines concerning some technological and methodological criteria which on line courses should follow. Similar initiatives have been activated in other contexts (e.g. in continuous distance learning courses in medicine) stressing different aspects of e-learning processes and highlighting the complexity of the topic. Besides, in a study carried out by our lnstitute we observed the perception of quality that students have concerning university on line courses. In this paper we compare the different perspectives, highlighting the main differences found. (literal)

Prodotto di

• Ecologia marina e pesca sostenibile (TA.P04.001.004) (Modulo)
• Progettare la qualita' dell'e-learning (IC.P03.006.001) (Modulo)
• Institute for coastal marine environment (IAMC) (Istituto)

Autore CNR

• VITO PIPITONE (Persona)
• MARIO ALLEGRA (Persona)
• GIOVANNI FULANTELLI (Unità di personale interno)

Insieme di parole chiave

• Keywords of "Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning" (Insieme di parole chiave)

Incoming links:

Prodotto

• Institute for coastal marine environment (IAMC) (Istituto)
• Ecologia marina e pesca sostenibile (TA.P04.001.004) (Modulo)
• Progettare la qualita' dell'e-learning (IC.P03.006.001) (Modulo)

Autore CNR di

• MARIO ALLEGRA (Persona)
• VITO PIPITONE (Persona)
• GIOVANNI FULANTELLI (Unità di personale interno)

Insieme di parole chiave di

• Keywords of "Certification Vs Evaluation of Quality in E-Learning" (Insieme di parole chiave)