http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/individuo/prodotto/ID167160
White marbles in Roman architecture: Electron paramagnetic resonance identification and bootstrap assessment of the results (Articolo in rivista)
- Type
- Label
- White marbles in Roman architecture: Electron paramagnetic resonance identification and bootstrap assessment of the results (Articolo in rivista) (literal)
- Anno
- 2005-01-01T00:00:00+01:00 (literal)
- Alternative label
Attanasio D., Platania R., Rocchi P. (2005)
White marbles in Roman architecture: Electron paramagnetic resonance identification and bootstrap assessment of the results
in Journal of archaeological science
(literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#autori
- Attanasio D., Platania R., Rocchi P. (literal)
- Pagina inizio
- Pagina fine
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#numeroVolume
- Rivista
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#note
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2004.09.009 (literal)
- Note
- ISI Web of Science (WOS) (literal)
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#affiliazioni
- CNR - ISM
CNR - IMIP (literal)
- Titolo
- White marbles in Roman architecture: Electron paramagnetic resonance identification and bootstrap assessment of the results (literal)
- Abstract
- On the basis of a previously reported spectroscopic and petrographic database, a general procedure for determining the provenance of white marbles is presented and used to establish a classification rule for the marbles most used in Roman architecture. The rule, based on a data set including seven groups (Carrara, Naxos, Paros, Pentelicon, Proconnesus and Thasos, calcitic and dolomitic marbles) and 712 samples, uses quadratic discriminant analysis and a set of four spectroscopic and two petrographic variables, after logarithmic transformation. The performance of the rule, obtained by resubstitution, is 93.3%. Validation of this result, carried out using the bootstrap technique, after briefly introducing the method, indicates that the resubstitution bias is 1.4%, with a final unbiased performance of about 92%. The bootstrap result agrees satisfactorily with alternative bias estimates (jackknife, cross-validation). Problems connected with the assignment of sets of unknown samples and the methods used for distinguishing reliable from doubtful assignments are discussed. (literal)
- Prodotto di
- Autore CNR
- Insieme di parole chiave
Incoming links:
- Autore CNR di
- Prodotto
- Http://www.cnr.it/ontology/cnr/pubblicazioni.owl#rivistaDi
- Insieme di parole chiave di